View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
bucky Member
Joined: May 10, 2007 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 9:31 pm Post subject: M38 lacks proper ground speed... is the manuel correct |
|
|
My M38 at full speed will do 40-45 MPH tops on flat pavement. I reciently put in a new clutch. It just doesnt seem to have the speed it did last year. I have to floor it to get 40 MPH now, and the books claim the M38 could do 60 MPH. I checked fluids and seals they are fine both tranny and transfer make no strange sounds. IS the manuel correct about speed? Also I swapped the tranny and transfer in mine out of a CJ 2A. I was told they were the same. Is this correct information? Thanks Bucky |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wesk Site Administrator
Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 16355 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That 60 in the book was for a top condition new unit. You should still be able to get 45 to 50. Before I accept my speedometer reading and start spending a lot of time and money I would first check the speedo's accuracy. The easiest way to do this is to take a small hand held GPS for a ride with you and observe the speed shown on the GPS.
The 2A and M38 tranny & transfer will interchange. The gear ratios differ very slightly. With all other numbers the same the 2A 1st gear is 3.339-1 vs M38 2.798-1 and transfer Lo range was 2A 2.46-1 vs M38 2.43-1. Final gear ratio's for both trannies is 1-1 and both transfers 1-1.
Did you change or repair anything else at the clutch change? _________________ Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maeserik Member
Joined: Jun 14, 2006 Posts: 226 Location: Wijnegem Belgium Europe
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 3:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mine M38 with right engine, T90 and transfercase max speed is about 50 mph. ( with window up ) The only difference i have is a smaller intakemanifold, foundout a year after the complete restoration, maybe if i changed it with a normal one the speed could higher, but i find 45 mph fast enough for the jeep.
We are now restoring a 1942 GPW and so we found out the intakemanifold on our M38 is smaller. Maybe to limit the max speed ? The M38 came from the Greece Army.
On the motorway in Belgium the min speed is 70 km/h = 44 mph
Erik _________________ 1942 GPW 71336 my son's jeep restored now
1951 M38 MC11891
1953 VW beetle (genuine german Käfer )
1957 fantastic wife
http://www.surfacezero.com/g503/showgallery.php?cat=1865
and this webside |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bucky Member
Joined: May 10, 2007 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wesk, I changed fluids and seals in tranny and transfer, I pulled the rear output yoke on the transfer after I wrote last night. It has more wobble than I think it should and its only got 2 shims. I wonder if the drag I feel is the gears against the case. Ill let you know.. Thanks Bucky |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bucky Member
Joined: May 10, 2007 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Mon Mar 10, 2008 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
OK now for a more a length answer. Clutch,pressureplate and release bearing are new. The tranny and transfer Ive left basically alone except for seals and fluids. I do agree 45-50 MPH is plenty. I notice that the engine labors harder than it used to no matter what gear Im in. I put the dail indicator on the transfer case rear shaft, Ive got 16 thousands clearance instead of 4-8 using only 2 shims. I used the jeep this winter to push round bales of hay to the horses. I bet I ruined what bearings I had left in the transfer with the stress...... Oh well, with your help I think I got a grip on my problem. Thanks guys Bucky |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wesk Site Administrator
Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 16355 Location: Wisconsin
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TomM Moderator
Joined: Apr 18, 2005 Posts: 458 Location: Rhode Island
|
Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Erik
you describe a "small intake manifold". Am I reading this correctly? Is it a generator manifold?
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
maeserik Member
Joined: Jun 14, 2006 Posts: 226 Location: Wijnegem Belgium Europe
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is the manifold on the M38:
on the GPW :
Erik _________________ 1942 GPW 71336 my son's jeep restored now
1951 M38 MC11891
1953 VW beetle (genuine german Käfer )
1957 fantastic wife
http://www.surfacezero.com/g503/showgallery.php?cat=1865
and this webside |
|
Back to top |
|
|
4x4M38 Member
Joined: May 30, 2014 Posts: 3459 Location: Texas Hill Country
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is an old thread but I ran into something the other day that may be
relevant. My Bubba M38 has a WO carb. In the process of pulling things
apart I found the gas pedal and linkage is not original/has been modified.
I was installing a replacement pedal and repairing the bell crank. When I
finished I was checking everything and found the bell crank hitting the block.
I took the rod off at the top of the bell crank and found the carb linkage would travel a good bit more. There was no way the carb would open completely
as modified.
So, Bubba had a self installed rev limiter which I guess out on the ranch he'd
never figure out.
It was a simple adjustment to loosen the nut on the rod and run it back towards the carb to give more travel. Now it moves from closed to full open without hitting the block. _________________ Brian
1950 M38
MC11481
http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=album372&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php |
|
Back to top |
|
|
skyjeep50 Member
Joined: Feb 20, 2007 Posts: 606 Location: Illinois
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 6:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
My M38 will do 62 mph - that's as far as I've pressed it, just once, might have had a little more. And that was way too fast! Usual cruise speed is 50 mph. Motor is/was a fresh rebuild and everything else has been gone through. The speedometer is accurate - verified with a GPS unit. _________________ 1951 M38 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wesk Site Administrator
Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 16355 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Skyjeep just mentioned what no has mentioned before in this post. Accuracy of instrumentation verified and that instrumentation was even analysed. A simple 10 minutes under the hood with the "proper test instruments" will confirm the condition of the equipment a lot better than this feels like this and that feels like that! All controls should be checked visually for proper travel limits. Another 20 minutes checking tire pressures and wheel rolling freedom will confirm rolling resistance levels. Then a tape measure and 3 more minutes checking the front end toe adjustment and you will have a handle on why your OLD jeep doesn't do 60 MPH.
"proper test instruments"
1-Dwell /TACH meter
2-Vacuum gauge
3-Timing light
4-Fuel Press Gauge
5-Tape measure _________________ Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php |
|
Back to top |
|
|
leecarr Member
Joined: Jul 15, 2013 Posts: 54 Location: Rochester, Massachusetts
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
How about tire size ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
4x4M38 Member
Joined: May 30, 2014 Posts: 3459 Location: Texas Hill Country
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
wesk Site Administrator
Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 16355 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 6:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The M38A1 with the different steering ratio handled 60 quite well. My stock 52 M38A1 I used as a daily driver to and from work in the 1980's, 20 miles each way on I-90 at Rapid City SD. She cruised at 60 MPH perfectly.
Tire size on our resto's should have been 700-16. Bigger is an obvious doggy ride lacking snort and smaller is an obvious slower ride with higher RPM's. _________________ Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|