View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
elias929 Member

Joined: Jul 18, 2013 Posts: 56 Location: terrebonne,Canada
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wesk Site Administrator


Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 16399 Location: Wisconsin
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
xdragoon Member
![]()
Joined: Sep 01, 2009 Posts: 17 Location: Lower Sackville, Nova Scotia, Canada
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
elias929 Member

Joined: Jul 18, 2013 Posts: 56 Location: terrebonne,Canada
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes Wesk, is a US model.
The original color is yellow, i think are a old M38 flight line.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
elias929 Member

Joined: Jul 18, 2013 Posts: 56 Location: terrebonne,Canada
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wesk Site Administrator


Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 16399 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 8:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
That is a very good story. But hundreds of those stories have been written on the retreat from the Chosin Reservoir. It was an unfortunate set of events set in motion by the beginning of a new warfare methodology. One where the unqualified politicians limited or directed combat activity creating much higher casualty rates then the generals would have if they had been allowed to prosecute the war from a professional military standpoint.
Note that the jeep used during that period of the war was the WWII MB and GPW not the M38. The M38 made a very limited appearance in the korean war starting in the summer of 1952 and then since they were very new and different jeeps they were kept close to the main unit's headquarters. The M38A1 appearing in Kore the summer of 1953 became the primary jeep in Korea almost overnight. But alas the truce had been signed in Sep 53 and the M38A1 became the lead post truce jeep. _________________ Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
elias929 Member

Joined: Jul 18, 2013 Posts: 56 Location: terrebonne,Canada
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
If I understand the M38 is a transition between the mb-gpw and M38A1 and served in the wars very little. But I love this model and i find this model of jeep very beautiful... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wesk Site Administrator


Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 16399 Location: Wisconsin
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wesk Site Administrator


Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 16399 Location: Wisconsin
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
The primary reason for the M38 not getting into action in Korea was the many differences with the parts and electrical/ignition system required a completely different logistics system to support it and it was much simpler to leave the thousands of WWII jeeps in the front lines and their spare parts and skilled technicians there with them and hold the few M38's that were available at the rear areas where delays in parts and technical help could be absorbed without any serious impact on frontline operations. The Army being the largest operator was unable to field this new M38 during the final year of the war with adequate logistics support. For the Marines, being a much smaller organization, it was much more difficult to support large changes in their logistical system to support a new M38 in their midst in the front lines. The only real evidence to date that any M38 made a frontline appearance in Korea from 1952 through Sep 53 were some Canadian combat units showed up at the front with M38 CDN's. _________________ Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
elias929 Member

Joined: Jul 18, 2013 Posts: 56 Location: terrebonne,Canada
|
Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2013 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Wes for the informations...
In the same time, i replace my clutch and if possible i would like to know for adjusting the clutch, the distance between the clutch bearing and the fingers of pressure plate. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
wesk Site Administrator


Joined: Apr 04, 2005 Posts: 16399 Location: Wisconsin
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
elias929 Member

Joined: Jul 18, 2013 Posts: 56 Location: terrebonne,Canada
|
Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2013 6:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, the pressure plate is ok, is for the distance between the release bearing and the fingers. I found the answer on your link. The distance is 1/16 (1.58mm) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
elias929 Member

Joined: Jul 18, 2013 Posts: 56 Location: terrebonne,Canada
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|