In your TM 9-8014 you will find on page 255, Figures142 & 143 showing a new housing. _________________ Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
I reviewed the photos from TM 9-8014, page 255, Figures 142 & 143.
The bottom appears to have the same machining.
No photo of the top.
So the answer is...
factory machining?
Since the inside of the knuckle and the knuckle itself are symmetrical it is a safe assumption that the top required the same clearance machining as the bottom. _________________ Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
Thanks Wes!
The upper and lower king pin bearing cups were worn.
It appears one may have spun (based on marking along the outside).
Would it be prudent to use a Loctite 648 type bearing retainer when installing new cups?
The housing does not appear wallowed out and it is still an interference fit.
If you still have a proper interference fit then I see no need for any LocTite. These are steering pivot points and are not exposed to any form of high speed spinning forces. Those which show evidence of the bearing race rotating were most likely seriously worn or corroded or damaged causing the rotation. All common results of aging without proper preventative maintenance. _________________ Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum