Create an account Home  ·  ·  Forums  ·  ·  Articles  ·  ·  Downloads  ·  ·  Photo Gallery  
Login
Nickname

Password

Don't have an account yet? You can create one here.

Navigation
· Home
· Article Archive
· Article Submit
· Downloads
· FAQ
· Forums
· Members List
· Photo Gallery
· Private Messages
· Web Links
· Your Account

Search Articles



Forums

Transfer Case rebuild issues
Zerks causing trouble.
1952 M38 converting to 12V
M38A1 Slave Bucket location
M274 A3 Mule For Sale
flywheel advice
conversion from a 12 volt system back to a 24 volt system
M151 A2 + M416 Trailer For Sale
M38 ignition points condensor
TM9-8015-1 Clarification

Willys M Jeeps Forums


willysmjeeps.com :: View topic - new coil vs old coil
 Forum FAQForum FAQ   SearchSearch   UsergroupsUsergroups   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

new coil vs old coil
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    willysmjeeps.com Forum Index -> Technical Knowledge Base
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Bobber
Member


Joined: Feb 09, 2014
Posts: 178
Location: Tri Cities, Washington

PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 11:51 am    Post subject: new coil vs old coil Reply with quote

Confused, is this coil bad? I read where the coil should read .5 to 1.0 OHMS on the lowest setting. I have about 12.9 OHMS on the lowest setting, Am I reading it wrong or have the wrong setting? My new coil reads about the same. new coil
[url][/url]

old coil

What is happening is after I drive it sometimes it won't start again. I don't have spark. I thought it could be the ignition, but I pulled wire #12 from the switch to dist. and have 25volts. It runs great, sometimes it just won't start. Condenser/points are new and set at 20 thousands. I followed the trouble shooting part in the manual. Any thoughts?
Thank You.
_________________
Rusty, 1952 M38, Koenig hard top.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator


Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 16241
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote


This is not the correct way to read secondary resistance. Move that test probe off the + pole and place it on the metal coil case. Now tell us what the reading is. Also when you have selected the 20K position on the meter dial the reading in your window then becomes 10,980 Ohms.


This reading is 14, 900 Ohms. Again you should use the metal coil case not the + post for secondary resistance readings.


This is reading primary resistance. This is the correct way to read primary resistance.


This is the correct way to take the readings.

Also since you say the coil gets you started when cold but won't when hot is why the test I show is always done on a cold coil first and then you heat the coil with a heat gun and take readings again.
_________________
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bobber
Member


Joined: Feb 09, 2014
Posts: 178
Location: Tri Cities, Washington

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 12:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

With the coil on the bench, there was no reading when the test probe was on the metal case and the other test probe on either pole. When I placed the test probe on the high output and the side of the case, there again was no reading. The only time I got a reading was when touching both poles.
Thank you.
_________________
Rusty, 1952 M38, Koenig hard top.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator


Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 16241
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Using my illustration tell me the reading between B & C?
_________________
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bobber
Member


Joined: Feb 09, 2014
Posts: 178
Location: Tri Cities, Washington

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

On the 20k setting, I get 15.07 OHMs.
_________________
Rusty, 1952 M38, Koenig hard top.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Bobber
Member


Joined: Feb 09, 2014
Posts: 178
Location: Tri Cities, Washington

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In the manual it tells you to check coil, condenser and or starter switch by using a known one to work. Well now I have a new one and I switched them out. Then I replaced my starter switch. I think the starter switch was the problem. It hasn't exhibited the same problem since. I was still interested in the proper way to test my coil, Thank you
_________________
Rusty, 1952 M38, Koenig hard top.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator


Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 16241
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 12:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If you review the testing notes in my illustration your secondary reading is within tolerance and your primary reading is way out of tolerance. Have you compared hot and cold readings?
_________________
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bobber
Member


Joined: Feb 09, 2014
Posts: 178
Location: Tri Cities, Washington

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

very little change. I ran the heat gun on it for about a minute, a little too warm to hold too long.
_________________
Rusty, 1952 M38, Koenig hard top.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator


Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 16241
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Then I would say since your primary resistance is way too high you need a new coil. Generally excess heat will drive a resistance reading higher.
_________________
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Bobber
Member


Joined: Feb 09, 2014
Posts: 178
Location: Tri Cities, Washington

PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I did change it out, and it does start every time after it warms up. I did change out the starter switch just cause it was sticky when turned. Wait till you read my next post. BTW the fuel lines are all new, tank was flushed, but there was some fine debris that was found in the fuel filter.

Thanks
_________________
Rusty, 1952 M38, Koenig hard top.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
cabinfever
Member


Joined: May 14, 2013
Posts: 201
Location: Between Crosslake and Emily, Minnesota

PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2017 10:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wes, I am still trouble shooting why I cannot get my M38A1 to start after re-torquing my head bolts. (It ran just fine after the replacing the cylinder head)

Could you correct/revise the picture URLs in your second post of this thread? Thanks!

In case you're wondering, I do have spark, but maybe its not a strong spark. So, I thought I'd check the coil and point gap.
_________________
Steve Stark - 1955 M38A1 MD #85388

Member - MVPA #35153
Member - Red Bull Historic Military Vehicle Association
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator


Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 16241
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2017 12:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have no idea where those photos came from and they are not where they were anymore so I cannot retrieve them. Based on their tags you don't need them anyway. The 4th photo shows all you need to know to take proper readings.

Quote:


This is not the correct way to read secondary resistance. Move that test probe off the + pole and place it on the metal coil case. Now tell us what the reading is. Also when you have selected the 20K position on the meter dial the reading in your window then becomes 10,980 Ohms.

This one you do not need. It shows the wrong way to do it.


This reading is 14, 900 Ohms. Again you should use the metal coil case not the + post for secondary resistance readings.

This one probably showed a meter reading and again the wrong connections.


This is reading primary resistance. This is the correct way to read primary resistance.

This one would have shown the connections at bottom of my 4th photo.

_________________
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
cabinfever
Member


Joined: May 14, 2013
Posts: 201
Location: Between Crosslake and Emily, Minnesota

PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2017 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just read the resistance according to your photo. All readings are cold. (its 42º right now).

A to B: 6.2 ohms

C to Grd: no conductance (in other words, the VOM got no readings set at both the 20K and 200K scale)

I assume there is no reason to take hot readings and that I need a new coil. Is that correct?
_________________
Steve Stark - 1955 M38A1 MD #85388

Member - MVPA #35153
Member - Red Bull Historic Military Vehicle Association
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator


Joined: Apr 04, 2005
Posts: 16241
Location: Wisconsin

PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2017 2:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Correct.
_________________
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules.php?set_albumName=Wes-Knettle&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_album.php
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
cabinfever
Member


Joined: May 14, 2013
Posts: 201
Location: Between Crosslake and Emily, Minnesota

PostPosted: Sat May 20, 2017 2:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks, Wes.

The insulation on the wire that goes from terminal B to D was all crunchy and had some major bare spots where the brittle insulation had fallen off. Do you suppose this wire could have been the culprit that destroyed the coil?
_________________
Steve Stark - 1955 M38A1 MD #85388

Member - MVPA #35153
Member - Red Bull Historic Military Vehicle Association
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    willysmjeeps.com Forum Index -> Technical Knowledge Base All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001 phpBB Group
Forums ©

 



PHP-Nuke Copyright © 2005 by Francisco Burzi. This is free software, and you may redistribute it under the GPL. PHP-Nuke comes with absolutely no warranty, for details, see the license.