But I simply tried to answer your question and I offered ir-reputable evidence that there are a lot more 50-R's rated at 5000 than the one unit you showed us rated at 8000 with a mismatched plate stamping.Hi Wes...... I am curious where the info comes from relating to the 50R being a 5000# winch?
M38/M38A1 Winch Part
- wesk
- Site Administrator

- Posts: 16466
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Contact:
It was stamped 8000 by a different set of number stamps than used on the 50-R. That's clear to see. I have no desire to argue this with you Mike. It's obvious from your photo that 8000 was stamped by a different set of stamp dies. If Keith is aware of any special 50-R production that went with 8000 he hasn't shared that with us.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
- lowenuf
- Member
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2015 6:00 pm
Wes, I am in no way trying to conjure up an arguement either..... You DID offer proof that I asked for, and I appreciate that info.... I just know that this isn't the first 50R that I have seen stamped 8000#.
I shall research further regarding the font issue. I will not imply that I disagree with that comment, rather I just can't agree with it at the present moment.
Maybe, just maybe, since this was a later issue "kit", that Ramsey retested the capacity, and it met criteria for 8000#.......
again, not trying to start disgruntlement, rather fruitful conjecture....
I shall research further regarding the font issue. I will not imply that I disagree with that comment, rather I just can't agree with it at the present moment.
Maybe, just maybe, since this was a later issue "kit", that Ramsey retested the capacity, and it met criteria for 8000#.......
again, not trying to start disgruntlement, rather fruitful conjecture....
- wesk
- Site Administrator

- Posts: 16466
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Contact:
I would suspect your unit is a rebuild that was uprated. You may want to check your actual cable type, size & rating.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100
Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
- WillysMotors
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2006 6:00 pm
- DFoley
- Contributor

- Posts: 109
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: Del Rio, Texas
- Bill_F
- Jeep Enthusiast

- Posts: 891
- Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 6:00 pm
- Location: New Hampshire
-
bbloom
- Contributor

- Posts: 92
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:00 pm
- Location: Kansas City
Thanks for the picture Dan. I bought one of those connectors. Haven't installed it yet.
Bill
GP, GPA, GPW, M38, M38A1
Bantam T-3, M100
MVPA #1196
Photo Album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
GP, GPA, GPW, M38, M38A1
Bantam T-3, M100
MVPA #1196
Photo Album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php


