Fuel gauge bad? Please confirm.

Discussion topics on Willys Overland M series vehicles

Moderators: TomM, Moderator, wesk

User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

It will be interesting to see this new service bulletin. I haven't found one yet.

On another note I will point out again the M170 sender and gauge are different and not meant to be used on the M38 or the M38A1 and the M170 has a different shape and volume tank that holds 20 gallons when full vs 17 in the M38A1 and 13 in the M38. So mix and matching does not work well between these three different fuel systems.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
JeepdaddyRC
Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2020 6:00 pm

Post by JeepdaddyRC »

Ohm readings for sender 1200923-2
1.8 ohms empty (float down)
24.4 ohms 1/2 full
40.5 ohms full (float up)

Ohm readings for sender 11640674
3.4 ohms empty (float down)
16.1 ohms 1/2 full
32.9 ohms full (float up)

Both floats go up and to the right (with Douglas connector facing forward). The original sender float went up and to the left.

1952 M38
Fuel gauges tested: 7728852 AC 1517561
Gauge reads empty with float down. Gauge reads full with ground removed. Gauge reads slightly over 1/2 full with both senders float up.
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

Your results only point to two possible culprits. Mismatch caused by senders resistance or gauge malfunction. I would suggest your next step is getting the correct sender since it is obvious they are not the correct part number.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
BobW
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Monticello, NY
Contact:

Post by BobW »

TB ORD 659 does not mention the resistance value of the sending unit. I like the last paragraph "Note".


Image


Image
Bob W. Monticello, NY. 1952 CJ3A, 1952 M38, 1950 CJV-35/U
Post Reply