South Dakota M38

Start your project thread here for advice and for others to follow along with your project. This is a long term thread.

Moderator: wesk

aforests
Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: South Dakota - Aberdeen

South Dakota M38

Post by aforests »

Figured I should start posting pictures of my progress this winter, so here goes... few pictures to start....



Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Aaron
1950 M38 - #MC11328, 24volt, 1948 CJ2A (Lefty)

PHOTO ALBUM
http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
4x4M38
Member
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: Texas Hill Country

Post by 4x4M38 »

That's fine work there Aaron. You should bd proud.

Looks like a steering stabilizer mount on the right tie rod
With the work you are doing you should not need it.

Keep the pics coming!
Brian
User avatar
Bretto
Member
Posts: 1390
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 6:00 pm
Location: Orem, UT

Post by Bretto »

Looking good man!
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

You are making nice progress there.

Unless you have a lot of slop elsewhere in the steering it looks like you have rebuilt all the tie rods and bell crank I would chuck that steering stabilizer. It is just a band aid for the cheap or lazy folks who won't properly maintain and repair their steering components.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
brimac
Member
Posts: 49
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 6:00 pm
Location: Brockton Ma.

Post by brimac »

Looking nice and clean. I had so much snow and cold weather I been snowed out from working my M38.
User avatar
DanS
Member
Posts: 159
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 6:00 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by DanS »

Maybe a photo issue, but it looks like you have the longer brake pads on the back of the axel? The longer pads should face the front of the jeep. Just trying to help.

Dan
Dan Schultz
MD20035 9/1952
MC70324 dod 6/52
GPW 14944 dod 4/10/42
K38 Linemans Trailer 4/43
M100 Trailer 01177488 dod 8/51
User avatar
4x4M38
Member
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: Texas Hill Country

Post by 4x4M38 »

Wow,
Good catch Dan-o!
[/u]
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

Good eye Dan!
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
aforests
Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: South Dakota - Aberdeen

Post by aforests »

Actually those are the short ones in the back. Short pads on back axel, long pads on front axel.
Aaron
1950 M38 - #MC11328, 24volt, 1948 CJ2A (Lefty)

PHOTO ALBUM
http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

Actually each brake gets one short and one longs shoe.

Image
Front axle brakes Long shoe on front and short shoe on the back.

Image
Rear axle brakes long shoe on front and short shoe on rear.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
aforests
Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: South Dakota - Aberdeen

Post by aforests »

Looks like I have some work to do...
Aaron
1950 M38 - #MC11328, 24volt, 1948 CJ2A (Lefty)

PHOTO ALBUM
http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
4x4M38
Member
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: Texas Hill Country

Post by 4x4M38 »

Hey,
At least they are clean!
aforests
Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: South Dakota - Aberdeen

Post by aforests »

I can see myself really procrastinating the job of pulling everything apart and switching around brake shoes, re-adjusting everything, etc...

Although I want everything to be right, any big negatives on leaving it the way it is? that is with the short shoes on the rear axle and the long shoes on the front axle?
Aaron
1950 M38 - #MC11328, 24volt, 1948 CJ2A (Lefty)

PHOTO ALBUM
http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
DanS
Member
Posts: 159
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2012 6:00 pm
Location: Minnesota

Post by DanS »

I would do it. The brakes on these jeeps are marginal, even when everything is proper. The installation was a design feature that I feel is not worth compromising. It is not a huge a job, like others said, it is all clean.

Dan
Dan Schultz
MD20035 9/1952
MC70324 dod 6/52
GPW 14944 dod 4/10/42
K38 Linemans Trailer 4/43
M100 Trailer 01177488 dod 8/51
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

M38 brakes are the non-servo type. That means the big shoe goes on the front and the reason for putting it there is to reduce wheel hop when braking.

The servo-type brakes found on later jeeps are a floating assembly (not rigid anchored at the bottom) and they use the big shoe in the back so that when brake is initially applied the bigger shoe being dominant has a tendency to force the brake assembly to a tighter engagement earlier on.

So I would suggest following Dan's suggestion and always make sure the two big safety items, STEERING & BRAKES are done right and reliable!
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
Post Reply