Why 2 holes in the front bumper M 38?

Discussion topics on Willys Overland M series vehicles
User avatar
DocUwe
Member
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Bernried near Munich
Contact:

Why 2 holes in the front bumper M 38?

Post by DocUwe »

What is the reason of the 2 holes in the M 38 front bumper (right side)?

Image

Regards Uwe
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16469
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

It's a leftover form the CJ3A production it was based on. The holes are for the old "T" style license plate bracket.

Image
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
DocUwe
Member
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Bernried near Munich
Contact:

Post by DocUwe »

Thank you very much! Now I know it :)

The next "file X"-question:
what is the use of the hole in the M 38-rim?

Image

Regards Uwe 8)
User avatar
Ryan_Miller
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Kansas

Post by Ryan_Miller »

Manufacter's mark to easily identify the military rims from the civilian rims.
Ryan Miller
MVPA # 22010
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16469
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

It has not been determined beyond any reasonable doubt yet. The 1/8" hole is found on the 16 x 4.5" military wheel with the safety bead and without for the later replacement wheel. It is also found on the civilian Willys Pickup 16x5" wheel. The best explanation to date was it helped ID the wheel on the assembly line. But this brings into question the pickup wheel on the same line.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
whydahdvr
Jeep Enthusiast
Jeep Enthusiast
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Melrose, MA and Santa Fe, NM

Post by whydahdvr »

Wes, et al, in regards to the pick-up wheel, is it possible that Willy's made a decision during production to use the combat/military wheel on a civilian pick-up due to better durability and construction? I'm thinking of past discussions regarding the seat covers and that sometimes production-line decisions and changes weren't well documented at a corporate level. Just a thought.
-Josh
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16469
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

Note that the rim width of the military wheel is 4.5" and the pickup wheel is 5.0". The two entirely seperate parts. Also the pickup wheel came first.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
whydahdvr
Jeep Enthusiast
Jeep Enthusiast
Posts: 647
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Melrose, MA and Santa Fe, NM

Post by whydahdvr »

Got it. So much for that theory! :-)
User avatar
DocUwe
Member
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:00 pm
Location: Bernried near Munich
Contact:

Post by DocUwe »

Thank you all! Now I can live further 8)
Regards Uwe
43 MB, 52 M38, 55 Bantam licensed trailer, 08 Commander Hemi, JK Rubi
User avatar
Jim
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 196
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Van Buren, Arkansas
Contact:

Post by Jim »

Thanks for the info on the two holes!! I know the
big hole in the center was for a hand crank, but
what about the other holes on the left side?

Jim in Darkest Arkansas
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16469
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

Image
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
TomM
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Rhode Island

early vs late bumper

Post by TomM »

Early M38 vs late M38 bumper:
We discussed this earlier but never had a conclusion.

Hole #5
Early M38 bumper - pre bumper mounted shackle bracket = 11/32"
Late M38 bumper with shackle mount = 5/8"

Has this been confirmed?

Tom
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16469
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

We need a good sampling of Sep 1950 thru about April 1951 M38 original front bumpers to be sure. But all the lift shackle brackets used 1/2x20 bolts so I don't see why there would be a different hole size for early vs late.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
TomM
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 458
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Rhode Island

bumpers

Post by TomM »

The reasoning was that with the early shackle bracket being set back from the bumper there may not have been a 5/8 hole for a 1/2" bolt. A smaller bolt would have been accomodated instead.

The sampling of early bumpers would be needed but until then take a look at this picture:
TM9-1804A
June 1951
Page 19
Figure 9

That single bolt on the bumper is not the same as the 1/2" bolt going through the shackle bracket.

Tom
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16469
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

:? I'm not always this confused. Now I see the light. Yes the original holes would have been for the six 3/8" bolts originally used to attach the bumper to the frame but when the change in front lifting shackles occurred my best guess is the factory drawing was amended to show the larger upper hole but the bumper part number was not changed nor was the change on the 3/8" bolts from 6 each to 4 each made in neither the 51 or 55 ORD 9. You'll note the 55 ORD 9 shows a supersedure to the 2nd series M38A1 bumper that was introduced to the A1 late 52 or early 53. This supersedure does not address the original M38 bumper vs shackle brackets but would have accomadated the late bracket 1/2" top bolt..
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
Post Reply