early m38 front lifting shackles

Discussion topics on Willys Overland M series vehicles

Moderators: TomM, Moderator, wesk

Post Reply
User avatar
radtech
Member
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:00 pm

early m38 front lifting shackles

Post by radtech »

Anyone know the serial number cut off when they changed the front lifting shacles on the M38.
User avatar
4x4M38
Member
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: Texas Hill Country

Post by 4x4M38 »

Interesting. The 1955 Ord 9 shows different
front and rear shackles only, no s/n change
to the front shackle design.

Dr. Ryan’s book only states May/June 1951.
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

The change is in the 1951 ORD 9. It was printed in Nov 51 but the cover states it was current as of Aug 51. So the assumption is the change occurred between Sep 1950 and Aug 1951.

Image

Image

Ryan, in his M38 Book simply notes the early rear shackles on the front arrangement appears to have been discontinued around May 1951.

The real proof would be in the blue print change for the frame or in the Factory BOM's.

Image
Early

Image
Late
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
kenperkins
Member
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Livermore Ca.

Post by kenperkins »

MC 21171 (5-'51 ) has late lifting hooks. The frame is prepped for the early bracket but, no weldolet in the rear hole.

MC 22936 (6-'51 ) has late lifting hooks and framed is not prepped for early bracket.

maybe that helps narrow it down a little.
'51 M38 #22936,
'51 M100 Dunbar
#01164782
'53 M100 Dunbar
M416b1
2- M762
MVPA #11788
MVCC LIFER
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

It helps but like all other attempts at dating using existing test subjects we have absolutely no way to guarantee the subject is truly untouched or unmodified by human hands. With depots rebuilding these jeeps in the 50's & 60's completely disassembling them and then re-mating various jeep parts at the end of the line there really is no guarantee on the accuracy of our dating attempts.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
kenperkins
Member
Posts: 285
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Livermore Ca.

Post by kenperkins »

Wes,...while ya got the ORD9 open to this page...what is WO 647415...top of page
SPACER , bolt snow plow ??? :?
'51 M38 #22936,
'51 M100 Dunbar
#01164782
'53 M100 Dunbar
M416b1
2- M762
MVPA #11788
MVCC LIFER
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

That spacer is listed the same way in both ORD 9's. It would be the steel spacer between the inboard boxed frame rail panel and the frame rail between the bumber and the round crossmember. One on each side.

Image
It would be the spacer inside this 5/8" diameter hole.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
4x4M38
Member
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: Texas Hill Country

Post by 4x4M38 »

So,
Is that a CJ2A or 3A part number,
then co-opted for the winch mount
for the M38?
User avatar
radtech
Member
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:00 pm

Post by radtech »

Is there a reason why there are 4 rear lifting hooks listed and only 2 front?My original 1950 M38 10675 has the same in the front as in the rear.
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

Is that a CJ2A or 3A part number,
then co-opted for the winch mount
for the M38?
Yes, it originated in the old CJ2A parts manual.
Is there a reason why there are 4 rear lifting hooks listed and only 2 front?My original 1950 M38 10675 has the same in the front as in the rear.
Yes, you came in late on this discussion, early M38's thru about spring/summer 1951 used 4 each rear style shackles on both front & rear. Later M38's used a totally different front shackle. I cannot offer an explanation for why the parts manual author failed to separate the two with serial cutoffs but that is a common problem with most of the manuals for these jeeps.
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
shopteach
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 6:00 pm
Location: Salem Ohio

Post by shopteach »

My M38 was built in 8-51. Can I assume I should have the late style?
User avatar
4x4M38
Member
Posts: 3487
Joined: Thu May 29, 2014 6:00 pm
Location: Texas Hill Country

Post by 4x4M38 »

Hi Wes,
Is that your AF M38 in the last photo?

Is it safe to assume the late front shackle equipped
M38’s didn’t even have that second hole in the front
frame member for the early bracket?

The photo above shows only one hole on top.
User avatar
wesk
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 16413
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Contact:

Post by wesk »

ShopTeach: Does your frame have the holes for the late type or early type front shackle bracket?

Image
Wes K
45 MB, 51 M38, 54 M37, 66 M101A1, 60 CJ5, 76 DJ5D, 47Bantam T3-C & 5? M100

Mjeeps photo album: http://www.willysmjeeps.com/v2/modules. ... _album.php
User avatar
shopteach
Member
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 6:00 pm
Location: Salem Ohio

Post by shopteach »

Wes, mine has the late brackets. Thank you for the photo, I will look for the late lifting rings
Post Reply