Page 1 of 1
early m38 front lifting shackles
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 8:16 am
by radtech
Anyone know the serial number cut off when they changed the front lifting shacles on the M38.
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 10:01 am
by 4x4M38
Interesting. The 1955 Ord 9 shows different
front and rear shackles only, no s/n change
to the front shackle design.
Dr. Ryan’s book only states May/June 1951.
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 11:05 am
by wesk
The change is in the 1951 ORD 9. It was printed in Nov 51 but the cover states it was current as of Aug 51. So the assumption is the change occurred between Sep 1950 and Aug 1951.
Ryan, in his M38 Book simply notes the early rear shackles on the front arrangement appears to have been discontinued around May 1951.
The real proof would be in the blue print change for the frame or in the Factory BOM's.

Early

Late
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 2:33 pm
by kenperkins
MC 21171 (5-'51 ) has late lifting hooks. The frame is prepped for the early bracket but, no weldolet in the rear hole.
MC 22936 (6-'51 ) has late lifting hooks and framed is not prepped for early bracket.
maybe that helps narrow it down a little.
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 2:57 pm
by wesk
It helps but like all other attempts at dating using existing test subjects we have absolutely no way to guarantee the subject is truly untouched or unmodified by human hands. With depots rebuilding these jeeps in the 50's & 60's completely disassembling them and then re-mating various jeep parts at the end of the line there really is no guarantee on the accuracy of our dating attempts.
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:23 pm
by kenperkins
Wes,...while ya got the ORD9 open to this page...what is WO 647415...top of page
SPACER , bolt snow plow ???

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 3:49 pm
by wesk
That spacer is listed the same way in both ORD 9's. It would be the steel spacer between the inboard boxed frame rail panel and the frame rail between the bumber and the round crossmember. One on each side.

It would be the spacer inside this 5/8" diameter hole.
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 5:01 pm
by 4x4M38
So,
Is that a CJ2A or 3A part number,
then co-opted for the winch mount
for the M38?
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 5:39 pm
by radtech
Is there a reason why there are 4 rear lifting hooks listed and only 2 front?My original 1950 M38 10675 has the same in the front as in the rear.
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 6:18 pm
by wesk
Is that a CJ2A or 3A part number,
then co-opted for the winch mount
for the M38?
Yes, it originated in the old CJ2A parts manual.
Is there a reason why there are 4 rear lifting hooks listed and only 2 front?My original 1950 M38 10675 has the same in the front as in the rear.
Yes, you came in late on this discussion, early M38's thru about spring/summer 1951 used 4 each rear style shackles on both front & rear. Later M38's used a totally different front shackle. I cannot offer an explanation for why the parts manual author failed to separate the two with serial cutoffs but that is a common problem with most of the manuals for these jeeps.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 11:00 am
by shopteach
My M38 was built in 8-51. Can I assume I should have the late style?
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 1:15 pm
by 4x4M38
Hi Wes,
Is that your AF M38 in the last photo?
Is it safe to assume the late front shackle equipped
M38’s didn’t even have that second hole in the front
frame member for the early bracket?
The photo above shows only one hole on top.
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 2:37 pm
by wesk
ShopTeach: Does your frame have the holes for the late type or early type front shackle bracket?

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2018 9:57 am
by shopteach
Wes, mine has the late brackets. Thank you for the photo, I will look for the late lifting rings